Re: out of inodes... new install

["George Georgalis" <george@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 09:21:15AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
>:> Filesystem  1K-blocks    Used  Avail Capacity iused  ifree %iused  Mounted on
>:> /dev/ad0s2a    254063   63277 170461    27%    1849  61893    3%   /
>:> /dev/ad0s2d    254063     556 233182     0%     192  63550    0%   /var
>:> /dev/ad0s2e    254063       3 233735     0%       3  63739    0%   /tmp
>:> /dev/ad0s2f   3120908 2122892 748344    74%  195809     29  100%   /usr
>:> /dev/ad0s2g    952771  443491 433059    51%   39039 200319   16%   /home
>:> procfs              4       4      0   100%      22   6142    0%   /proc
>:> 
>:> ...all out ..for what it's worth...
>
>    I don't know why so few inodes were created for that filesystem.  I
>    tried simulating a disk of that size with VN and what I got was:
> 
>dhcp62# newfs -U /dev/vn0d
>	...
>dhcp62# mount /dev/vn0d /mnt
>dhcp62# df -i /mnt
>Filesystem 1K-blocks Used   Avail Capacity iused  ifree %iused  Mounted on
>/dev/vn0d    3072218    2 2826440     0%       1 384765    0%   /mnt
>
>dhcp62# newfs -U -f 1024 -b 8192 /dev/vn0d
>	...
>dhcp62# mount /dev/vn0d /mnt
>dhcp62# df -i /mnt
>Filesystem 1K-blocks Used   Avail Capacity iused  ifree %iused  Mounted on
>/dev/vn0d    3025130    1 2783119     0%       1 757117    0%   /mnt
>
>    By default newfs uses 2K/16K for the fragment and block size.  I
>    tried both the default and also manually setting it to 1K/8K.
>
>    Maybe there is a geometry issue here that we don't know about.  Could
>    you post the output of 'disklabel ad0s2' ?
>


# disklabel ad0s2
# /dev/ad0s2c:
type: unknown
disk: amnesiac
label: 
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 255
sectors/cylinder: 16065
cylinders: 873
sectors/unit: 14024745
rpm: 3600
interleave: 1
trackskew: 0
cylinderskew: 0
headswitch: 0		# milliseconds
track-to-track seek: 0	# milliseconds
drivedata: 0 

16 partitions:
#        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
  a:   524288        0    4.2BSD     1024  8192    22 	# (Cyl.    0 - 32*)
  b:  4194304   524288      swap                    	# (Cyl.   32*- 293*)
  c: 14024745        0    unused        0     0       	# (Cyl.    0 - 872)
  d:   524288  4718592    4.2BSD     1024  8192    22 	# (Cyl.  293*- 326*)
  e:   524288  5242880    4.2BSD     1024  8192    22 	# (Cyl.  326*- 358*)
  f:  6291456  5767168    4.2BSD     4096 16384   159 	# (Cyl.  358*- 750*)
  g:  1966121 12058624    4.2BSD     1024  8192    22 	# (Cyl.  750*- 872*)



I was thinking, I'd delete the 2nd and 3rd partition and install on the resulting free space, but happy to keep this around for whatever commands...

(btw "for what it's worth" was re the file count, until I get my TERM thing fixed I can't see well what I'm writing, from BSD)

// George


-- 
George Georgalis, Architect and administrator, Linux services. IXOYE
http://galis.org/george/  cell:646-331-2027  mailto:george@xxxxxxxxx
Key fingerprint = 5415 2738 61CF 6AE1 E9A7  9EF0 0186 503B 9831 1631