Re: Documenting LWKT?

[Warren Toomey <wkt@xxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     LWKT is extremely solid and well-defined now.
>     I think that this is a good time to push documentation of the LWKT
>     functions.  I would dearly love to see some manual pages written up
>     on them. Are you volunteering?

Yep. Do you want section 9 man pages, or something like the existing 
whitepaper (http://www.dragonflybsd.org/goals/threads.cgi) with more 
detail, or both?
	Warren