DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2004-03
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Goals for first release (June/USENIX)
:Hi !
:
:> * Syscall interface layer and messaging (true async syscalls), and
:> related upcall and other interfaces, such as placing the syscall
:> compatibility layer into userland.
:Does this imply async IO as well ? Or is this still way too hard ?
Yup, it does imply asynch I/O.
:> * Userland VFS and DEV interfaces. Not yet started. I'll consider this
:> goal as 'done' when I have sucessfully created a userland 'vn' like
:> device and migrated, say, ext2fs, to userland. As part of this I
:> am going to try to 'fix' the buffer cache code to reduce the number
:> of kvm mappings it has to do.
:Heeeey, are vfs environments included in that map ?
:(Thinking of the other thread on packages...)
Maybe, maybe not. As per another recent email I posted today we might
not actually need vfs environments to bootstrap our packaging system.
:I know, I've been laying low on the userland scheduler.
:But I still want that thing done. My personal goal is to
:have basic encapsulation until May. And an alternative scheduler at least
:as a possible option in the kernel config for 1.0.
:Kernel modules for that I don't see before autumn...
:
:The toughest issue for me - concerning encapsulation alone - is where to get
:run- and sleeptimes from the system in an appropriate and uniform manner.
:lwkt makes life easier, but not in that respect. Any hints ?
:(Maybe I'm just being blind...)
:
:Cheers
:Peter
You'd have to be a bit more specific. Run and sleep times are generally
accounted for. The only scheduler-specific case I guess is how it handles
wakeup after sleeping for a long period of time.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]