DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2004-03
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Benchmarking
:Some time ago I had a plan to benchmark several OS'es for fun&learning. As
:it turned out, due to the lack of time the process was very slow. I intend
:to do DragonFlyBSD next, so I'm asking: what would be the best way to
:install it? Download the bootable ISO (from
:http://www.dragonflybsd.org/main/download.cgi) and then upgrade to -current
:via cvs? Is there a somewhat step-by-step walkthrough of the process since,
:as I understand it there is no install/setup program?
:
:Also, if anybody has some performance-related patches, now would be a good
:time to commit them to CVS :)
:
:(Current results are in http://geri.cc.fer.hr/~ivoras/osbench/osbench.sxc;
:Summary: FreeBSD 5.2 is slower in synthetic tests but appears surprisingly
:better in a "real-world" test than 4.9).
Pretty comprehensive. The numbers are about what I expect. 5.x will
do better with pure userland cpu tests simply because it has a more
recent GCC installed, and will do worse on benchmarks requiring lots
of kernel interaction (like small-block writes) due to higher kernel
overheads. The 5.x pipe code is very well optimized so the results
there make sense, and the 5.x network code has a number of fixes in it
which 4.x never got.
I think DFly is in pretty good shape performance-wise but there is
at least one mbuf related patch we ought to throw in. Also, the
recent token code work has not been well optimized yet but I don't know
how much that will impact things relative to what we had before.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]