Re: Subversion Release Candidate

["Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Kip Macy wrote:
> 
> I can't speak for the group, but I think that it is appropriate to post
> here. Although my personal choice is bitkeeper, my contributions to
> DragonFly have been minimal and my primary interest is in seeing a move
> away from CVS.
>
the subject  has been discussed in FreeBSD too. It looks like developers feel
very happy with perforce, but there is a strong desire to keep using a
completely free solution, and although it still lacks some desirable features,
subversion seems to be the best option. 

I think the biggest problem for DragonFlyBSD would be that the conversion may
take precious developer time (setting it up), although it will payoff in the
long run. 
 
> The place to start would probably be to "mirror" the central CVS archive
> in subversion. Are there appropriate filters for doing something like
> that, or does one have to incrementally pull in patches?
>
It's a great idea! There are a couple of utilities to convert CVS to SVN, see
"Repository Converters" here:

http://subversion.tigris.org/project_links.html

    Pedro.


 
>                         -Kip
> 
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> 
> > Hi;
> >
> > I'm sorry if this is not the right forum for this but Subversion 1.0, a
> > replacement for CVS under and Apache/BSD-style license, will be released on Feb.
> > 23 2004.
> >
> > More information about subversion is, of course, here:
> >
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/
> >
> > I know some of the developers have already looked ar this. Perhaps it's time for
> > Dragonfly to consider moving to this "modern" tool?
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> >     Pedro.
> >
> > ps. BTW, can the porn/spam messages be removed from the news archive?
> >