Re: Bind update

[Emiel Kollof <coolvibe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

* Matthew Dillon (dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> :-On [20031122 20:12], Matthew Dillon (dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> :>   We should probably leave the base system stuff alone until we have our
> :>   own packaging system to replace it.
> :
> :But if it solves annoying bugs and/or security fixes?
> :
> :-- 
> :Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
> 
>     I meant, not rip it out of base yet... base would still be upated,
>     e.g. David's update.
> 
>     I haven't had a chance to look at it but if basic name serving works,
>     David, please go ahead and commit it (e.g. you did a buildworld,
>     installworld, reboot, and your DNS still works).

I use the bind that's in the base system on one internal nameserver at
home (kinda handy if one has several boxes). Anyway, the thing works
fine.

It would be possible to rip out bind, but one has to leave the libraries
that come with it (libisc et al) intact, since some of the programs in
usr.bin/usr.sbin use that.

Cheers,
Emiel
--