Re: any interest in importing pf?

[Bernhard Valenti <bernhard.valenti@xxxxxxx>]

On 06.11.2003 23:13, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:09:07 -0500, Richard Coleman wrote:
>
> > What plans do you have in mind for packet filtering and firewalls?  Are 
> > you planning to stick with ipfw and ipfilter?

> My thought of that... Anyone shouldn't replace or remove neither, but just
> add PF to have one more choice of firewall. :-) Unless, IPF and PF can't
> play together nice, then it explains.
>
> If add PF, then it means one of you will have to bring ALTQ in too? CARP
> will be insterest to play with too, btw.

I'm using IPFilter but recently looked at PF, and seems like PF can do 
the same as IPFilter and more. So i would like to have PF even if its 
instead of IPFilter. Also, the rules are somewhat compatible...

regards,
Bernhard