Re: any interest in importing pf?

[Hiten Pandya <hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeremy Messenger wrote:

> My thought of that... Anyone shouldn't replace or remove neither, but just
> add PF to have one more choice of firewall. :-) Unless, IPF and PF can't
> play together nice, then it explains.

	Donno about this, but we will surely need to update the
	PFIL_HOOKS code in-order to bring in OpenBSD's Packet Filter.

> If add PF, then it means one of you will have to bring ALTQ in too? CARP
> will be insterest to play with too, btw.

	We don't have to bring in ALTQ, but it would be good to have it
	IMHO.  As far as CARP is concerned, I wonder if FreeVRRP by the
	KAME project is better than it or not, is still yet to be
	researched.

	Regards,

--
Hiten Pandya
hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx