DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2003-10
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: packaging system
Right, I think the packaging system should most definately do the job
portupgrade currently does.
I don't think there's much sense in presenting two ways to do the same
thing -- it will only double the chance of strange errors, whether they
be human or machine.
[snip]
> An apt-like system is something I'd like to see, but I want to stress
> that I want to see portupgrade go away. Although it serves a need, it's
> a need that needs to be serviced by the packaging system. And the
> packaging system should be able to do a better job than portupgrade does
> now.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]