DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2003-10
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: splitting fnctl(), ioctl()
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:03:03PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :In splitting syscalls like fcntl() and ioctl(), I am considering doing
> :something like the following:
> :
> :int
> :fcntl(stuct fcntl_args *uap)
> :{
> : fcntl_copyin(uap->cmd, uap->arg, &buf);
> : kern_fcntl(uap->fd, uap->arg, &buf);
> : fcntl_copyout(uap->cmd, uap->arg, &buf);
> :}
> :
> :The buffer would be the size of the largest argument for fcntl.
> :The emulators would then implement their own versions of the copyin/
> :copyout functions. While this does separate the copyin/copyout,
> :it places code for the same fcntl in three different places.
> :
> :The ioctl() syscall will be a little more trouble. I don't like the
> :fact that drivers can copyin at their own discression, especially from
> :pointers stored in uap->arg.
> :
> :>From a syscall hacker's standpoint, I don't like the ioctl() interface.
> :
> :--
> : David P. Reese, Jr. daver@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> : http://www.gomerbud.com/daver/
>
> This could be a tough nut to crack. Have you coded up fcntl_copyin()
> and fcntl_copyout() yet? I'd like to see what they would contain.
>
> -Matt
> Matthew Dillon
> <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Not yet. However, I expect them to look like:
int
fcntl_copyin(int cmd, caddr_t arg, caddr_t buf)
{
switch (cmd) {
case F_GETFD:
break;
[snip]
case F_SETLK:
copyin(uap->arg, buf, sizeof(struct flock);
break;
case F_GETLK:
copyin(uap->arg, buf, sizeof(struct flock);
break;
}
}
int
fcntl_copyout(int cmd, caddr_t arg, caddr_t buf)
{
switch (cmd) {
case F_GETFD:
break;
[snip]
case F_SETLK:
break;
case F_GETLK:
copyout(buf, uap->arg, sizeof(struct flock);
}
}
While they get most of the job done, I don't like the fact that this
method separates the code.
--
David P. Reese, Jr. daver@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gomerbud.com/daver/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]