DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2003-09
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: new sysinstall
G065363@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030901144956.GA8023@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200309011613.h81GDt0C099442@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <200309011613.h81GDt0C099442@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <3f53d0f9$0$267$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.98.233.138
X-Trace: 1062457593 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 267 24.98.233.138
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:837
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Tcl/Tk should probably be discarded. We can't use the X interfacing
> because, well, it requires X and we are dedicated to a web environment
> now, and Tcl duplicates enough of PHP4's functionality that if we are
> going to select any language as the backend to the PHP4 pages I would
> rather it be an OO language.
I'll through out one other possibility to consider. Use tcl (not tk)
together with tclhttpd. This is a web server written entirely in tcl.
It is small, modular, easy to extend, and is plenty fast enough for the
purpose discussed. It is commonly used for embedding a webserver such
as this. If anyone is interested, they should check Brent Welch's book
for more information on tclhttpd.
And I believe the entire tcl installation, together with tclhttpd is
smaller than Apache.
That would kill two birds with one stone.
Richard Coleman
richardcoleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]