Re: Preliminary restructuring layout (was Re: sys/ tree re-structuring proposal)

[Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Awwwwww. :-(

Heh.

Cheers,
Bosko


On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:38:25PM -0700, Galen Sampson wrote:
> There has been talk on this list about the import of a new snapshot of the
> KAME network stack.  KAME produces snapshots for the freebsd 4.x branch
> weekly.  A KAME update is also on the TODO list for freebsd 5.2 (so
> dragonfly isn't the only project considering KAME updates).  Restructuring
> the source tree might hinder the efforts of the people trying to import a
> KAME snapshot if things get too different.
> 
> regards,
> Galen
> 
> "Julian Elischer" <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Pine.BSF.4.21.0308061450200.4704-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >
> > > :...
> > > :> ./kern
> > > :> ./libkern
> > > :> ./libkern/alpha
> > > :> ./net
> > > :> ./netgraph
> > > :
> > > :net/proto/inet
> > > :net/proto/inet6
> > >
> > >     How about:
> > >
> > >     netproto/ip4 (move ip_* from netinet)
> > >     netproto/tcp4 (move tcp_* from netinet)
> > >     netproto/udp4 (move tcp_* from netinet)
> > >     netproto/igmp4 (move igmp* from netinet)
> > >     netproto/ip6 ...
> > >     netproto/tcp6 ...
> > >     netproto/udp6 ...
> > >     netproto/esp6 ...
> > >     netproto/nd6 ...
> > >     netproto/ipsec6
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I might add I think splitting it differently give a hint to develpers
> > as to where to put NEW things..
> >
> > e.g.
> > netproto/inet/divert
> > netproto/inet/mynewprotocol
> > netproto/inet/ipfw
> >
> > >
> > >     I think this fits well with everything else in netproto.  I
> > >     should just do it all now rather then split the major
> > >     surgery up into multiple stages.
> > >
> > > -Matt
> > > Matthew Dillon
> > > <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Bosko Milekic  *  bmilekic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  *  bmilekic@xxxxxxxxxxx
TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services  *  http://www.technokratis.com/