DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2003-07
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Remove BIND, Sendmail, Perl and etc from base?
despite of this, i think having good high level languages in
base will speed up developing user software, which is a good
thing (tm).
I believe this too. The trick is to get a large group of
developers to agree on the same language... :-)
IMO, perl has grown so much that it is too large to have
in the base system -- and this situation gets even worse as
the newer versions of perl show up. Perl also proved to be
a headache when it came to cross-building the base system
for a new platform.
Although great languages, Perl and Python are very large systems
that are still changing (i.e. Perl6). For use in the base system,
you want something small and relatively unchanging. In the grand
scheme of things, something halfway between /bin/sh and Perl would
be ideal. I know the plan9 guys had similar ideas in mind when they
created "rc". But I think it is still too minimal. The closest
thing I can think of is perl4 or tcl.
But as I mentioned earlier, it doesn't really matter. Someone (Matt)
would just need to pick "anything" and bless it (put it in the base
system). Once the decision is made, then there should be a push
to take advantage of it and "really" leverage the language for such
tasks as user management, package system, build system, etc.
Richard Coleman
- References:
- Re: Remove BIND, Sendmail, Perl and etc from base?
- Re: Remove BIND, Sendmail, Perl and etc from base?
- Re: Remove BIND, Sendmail, Perl and etc from base?
- Re: Remove BIND, Sendmail, Perl and etc from base?
- From: Simon 'corecode' Schubert
- Re: Remove BIND, Sendmail, Perl and etc from base?
- Re: Remove BIND, Sendmail, Perl and etc from base?
- Re: Remove BIND, Sendmail, Perl and etc from base?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]