Re: DragonFly site

["Trevor Kendall" <trevorjk@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/1/06, Matthew Dillon <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> :Lets look at it another way.
> :
> :"It is not necessary to enter a spl() level or critical section to
> :preserve token atomicity." That sentence is implying that there is an
> :spl level in the kernel (which does not exist), as well as implying
> :that there is a critical section in the kernel (which does exist).
> :Should that sentence be changed to "It is not necessary to enter a
> :critical section to preserve token atomicity." since spl's no longer
> :exist and critical sections do exist still?
> :
> :Trevor
>
>     I desparately have to rewrite all that stuff, but it will be a few
>     weeks.  I have to stabilize HEAD and get MFS working again.  A bunch
>     of unexpected issues have popped up.
>
>                                         -Matt
>                                         Matthew Dillon
>                                         <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Should I leave the goals.cgi changes in the patch then? They are all
spelling fixes.

Trevor