Re: mdoc DragonFly known version numbers

[Sascha Wildner <saw@xxxxxxxxx>]

Francis Gudin wrote:
> Any insight ?

Ok, after some (at times a bit confusing but nevertheless insightful :) 
discussion, let me summarize what seems to be the consensus here:

1) Let's always refer to DEVELOPMENT version numbers since we can't be 
100% sure what the next RELEASE number is going to be.

2) Let's always use 2 digit version numbers since the third digit is 
more confusing than interesting in man page context.

I'll change stuff accordingly unless there are any objections within the 
next 12 hours. :)

Sascha

--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx