Wiki and docs in cvs

[justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Here's a question...  It looks like the wiki is working well to encourage
documentation additions.  It's lowered the "cost of entry" relative to
using the FreeBSD docproj material.

Should we look at a "release cycle", similar to what's happening with the
software?  i.e. declare a few weeks of typo-fixing, and then move the
documentation at that point into a separate copy, associated with that
release of DragonFly?

This way, documentation matches a particular release.  This may become
more significant as more radical features get moved in...  There's also
the bonus of regular cleanups for the docs.