From: | Peter Avalos <pavalos@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:48:44 -0500 |
Mail-followup-to: | commits@crater.dragonflybsd.org |
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 03:15:41PM +0100, Sascha Wildner wrote: > > After replacing the paths with summaries, how would someone search for > commits to certain files using only his mail/news client? > Ugh. Why would they do that? I don't think this is something we should try to support when git does a MUCH better job. > Full text search? Hmm, not possible using NNTP unless you download all > articles. Use gitweb or search the repo? Well not all of us read the > mailing lists on the same box (or platform even) where they keep the > repo. And having to keep an additional window open just to see what was > changed doesn't seem like an improvement for me, personally. > But your argument was for people to search for commits to certain files using a mail client. This seems really silly to me. If someone is interested the subject of a commit, they can open the email and see which files were changed in the diffstat. This is so much more logical than the other way around. > Summaries are sub-optimal for the Subject since they are human generated > and humans make spelling errors, might forget the > commit-structuring-rules and tend to formulate things differently from > what the guy who is searching might expect. I can understand that it > sounds like a good thing, but I fear that daily practice will not live > up to it. > This is easy though. Hell, it's already mentioned in committer(7). --Peter
Attachment:
pgp00002.pgp
Description: PGP signature