Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys errno.h

[Andreas Hauser <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

asmodai wrote @ Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:46:42 +0200:
> -On [20050703 21:37], Andreas Hauser (andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >I find it funny those that want to work on such things can't just back out the
> >changes in their tree but instead want to make all the other people suffer.
> 
> This *IS* -DEV.  Stability and user comfort is *NOT* guaranteed.

The ports uname hack is hardly about -DEV.
And even on -DEV i would ask to fix stuff first then turn it on.
I also doubt the errno problem would be related to -DEV only
since we wait for: you fixing and submitting, them including and
releasing and ports/pkgsrc updating.

And sadly since my wchar patch had been broken shortly before 1.2 release
and citrus came in after the release i can't use it. And even with citrus
there is no wchar support in statically linked binaries.
So now i have a so called *correct* solution instead of a working one.
And i am still missing the benchmarks or other proofs that citrus is better.

Personally i don't have problems having big changes in my tree
and i usually have. This thread is one of the reasons i often
keep changes to my self.

> *I* find it funny that those who are so complaining about apparent suffering
> are the people that are not submitting things upstream or working on third
> party stuff.

I fail to follow the reasoning here.


Andy