Re: cvs commit: src/share Makefile src/share/doc Makefile src/usr.sbin/lpr Makefile

[Hiten Pandya <hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :I have to say that I'm not really feeling comfortable with this commit. 
> :While it's true that several of those documents are outdated and 
> :historic there are some that still apply quite well and might be useful 
> :to get new users going more quickly (at a point before they have the 
> :source code, i.e. when booting from the LiveCD).
> :
> :Wouldn't it have been better to review them one by one and see what can 
> :be scrapped or not?
> :
> :Sascha
>
>     Well, lets take a poll.  My feeling is that the documents either aren't
>     used, or only a small part of them are used, or more up-to-date
>     information is available on the web anyway (cut-and-paste a URL).  Since
>     nobody is likely to be installing named or sendmail without some outside
>     access, I wouldn't expect the number of people actually using them
>     to be very high.
>
>     The last time I personally used those documents was once, a few years
>     ago, to look some stuff up about named.
>
> 							-Matt

	I don't see any point in building these papers; if someone is
	interested in them, they can build it for themselves.

	I have hardly used those documents, because better and updated
	information is available on the Internet.

		-Hiten
		hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx