Re: cvs commit: site/data/main team.cgi

[Kris Kennaway <kkenn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2004-03-18, Emiel Kollof <coolvibe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2004 05:35, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
>>     Just a general note to everyone in regards to commit privs.
>>     I've been fairly subdued in adding new committers (I really don't
>>     want to partition the project into 'committers' and 'non-committers'
>>     from a social point of view, like FreeBSD has), and I'm sure there
>>     are at least a few more people that really ought to get a commit bit.
>
> Amen. Great to see we're not making the same mistake FreeBSD did. I have to 
> say you're doing one hell of a job leading this project. 

Just curious, what do you think was the mistake that FreeBSD made?  If
you only have say 2 or 3 people to commit patches then it might work
fine when there are only a small number of submitters, but that model
just doesn't scale once you have hundreds of people submitting them.

Kris