[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #2259] off_t type definition

[Alex Hornung via Redmine <bugtracker-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Issue #2259 has been updated by Alex Hornung.


off_t is a signed type on every OS I know - and it most definitely is
signed on FreeBSD as well.

On 12/12/11 16:22, Robin Carey via Redmine wrote:
> 
> Issue #2259 has been reported by Robin Carey.
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> Bug #2259: off_t type definition
> http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2259
> 
> Author: Robin Carey
> Status: New
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee: 
> Category: 
> Target version: 
> 
> 
> Dear DragonFlyBSD bugs,
> 
> Whilst checking some software I wrote (on leaf.dragonflybsd.org), I
> discovered that the
> 
> off_t
> 
> type is a signed value (on leaf.dragonflybsd.org).
> 
> On OpenBSD and FreeBSD, off_t is an unsigned value (which I assume is what
> it is supposed to be).
>
----------------------------------------
Bug #2259: off_t type definition
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2259

Author: Robin Carey
Status: New
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 


Dear DragonFlyBSD bugs,

Whilst checking some software I wrote (on leaf.dragonflybsd.org), I
discovered that the

off_t

type is a signed value (on leaf.dragonflybsd.org).

On OpenBSD and FreeBSD, off_t is an unsigned value (which I assume is what
it is supposed to be).

-- 
Sincerely,

Robin Carey BSc


-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account