Re: [issue1849] panic: dsched: malloc limit exceeded

["Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote:

>     I'll mess with it a bit.  It's pretty clear that the extra
> thread_ctx's are getting stuck due to thread_io references which are not
> being torn down.  Now the question is how and where.
> 
>     It looks like there are a few places where subsystems still generate
>     their own pbufs.  CCD, the original ata driver (not nata), and
>     in fact devfs's device-special I/O is too.
> 
>     Are you using CCD or VN by any chance?  If not then there must be
>     some interaction with devfs.

	No CCD or VN, I am using a vinum RAID1.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN                                      | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/