Re: panic: assertion: leaf->base.obj_id == ip->obj_id in hammer_ip_delete_range

[YONETANI Tomokazu <qhwt+dfly@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:53:08AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>    So maybe this isn't related to a collision with a hammer cleanup
>    operation but instead something more conventional.

I have daily_clean_hammer_enable="NO" in /etc/periodic.conf and I haven't
issued it while running bulkbuild.  Looking at the output from `ps' macro,
it seems to me to be something between pkg_add (doing fsync) and hammer-S2.

				:
>    I've committed all the patches so far including some related to
>    Francois's bug report.  You can reset and pull the whole mess, or
>    just apply thte latest patch ec9b6294f7ea2d9365124dd1e50ebe21c78da8b2
>    to your already patched test system.

OK, I'll try the new code.

>    Oh, p.s. is the HAMMER filesystem mounted nohistory?  If so that would
>    explain why this second case is getting hit.

No, the HAMMER filesystem itself is not mounted with nohistory, but
PFSes involved in pbulk have nohistory flag set.