Re: [issue1313] Signal code in kernel needs major overhaul (signal queues, si_code, si_addr)

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alex Hornung (via DragonFly issue tracker) wrote:
> Alex Hornung <ahornung@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> About this: I really think we should implement si_code and si_addr asap, 
> without any major overhaul or anything. Not having for example CLD_EXITED 
> breaks pkgsrc build of boost-libs, which in turn breaks 40-something more 
> packages. Both FreeBSD and NetBSD support this properly.
>
> Any comments?

Agreed.