Re: [issue1501] mount_cd9660 segfaults

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alexander Polakov (via DragonFly issue tracker) wrote:
> Alexander Polakov <polachok@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> > mount_cd9660 segfaults if you don't specify -L.
> Okay, I'll fix this.
>
> > We should try to stay close to FreeBSDs behavior.
> Hey, why? It's confusing to have different options for the same thing. I mean -L 
> (mount_msdos) and -C (mount_cd9660). Can we have both in mount_cd9660 at least? 
> Pleeease.

They also have different semantics in FreeBSD.  I don't know what is 
better, I just know that they set a precedent, and we should have a very 
good reason to break with it.

cheers
  simon

--
  <3 the future  +++  RENT this banner advert  +++   ASCII Ribbon   /"\
  rock the past  +++  space for low CHF NOW!1  +++     Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \