Re: 1.9.x slices, newfs, and vinum problem?

[Chris Turner <c.turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Chris Turner wrote:
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
> 
>>     The question is whether we can simply require that vinum partitions
>>     skip the label area (i.e. the starting block has to be at least 16
>>     for a partition created with a normal disklabel) or whether there
>>     are backwards compatibility issues that require us to support vinum
>>     writing into the disk's label area.
>>
> 
alright.. scratch all the last message.. whatever is kept there looks to
be related to saving the cfg across boots.. investigating.