Re: /bin/sh or /bin/ash

[Stefan Krüger <skrueger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Christopher JS Vance wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 01:43:01AM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
> 
>>>    No, I think its best not to make a link.  We already have enough
>>>    shell names to deal with, it would just add confusion. 
> 
> 
> OpenBSD uses its own well-maintained ksh as sh, even on the install
> floppies.  Would it be reasonable to drop ash in favour of this?
I'd rahter see dflys sh synched/replaced with netbsd sh :)

see http://tinyurl.com/da7as
(http://groups-beta.google.com/group/muc.lists.netbsd.source-changes/msg/80d773890575887f?dmode=source)

regards,
SK